If you're looking for a robust perennial ground cover that will even thrive in dry shade look no further than Trachystemon oriantale. Its mass of foliage does the weed smothering efficiently and its purple blue flowers are a treat in the spring sunshine. Its mass of roots also make it a great plant for holding together the soil on slopes.







I believe the correct name would be "Abraham, Isaac and Jacob".
In any case, http://www.ukwildflowers.com/Web_pages/trachystemon_orientalis_abraham_isaac_jacob.htm indicates that it is a common name that has also been used for Pulmonaria and Symphytum, in all three cases because the flowers changed colours as they aged.
Posted by: Mark | October 30, 2009 at 02:42 PM
I agree that "Abraham, Isaac and Jacob" is far more logical and if I'd looked in my own encyclopedia I would have found that out!! I was just bewidered by the reference I came across in someone else's book. (I won't reveal who as they obviously made a silly slip.)
Posted by: Graham Rice | October 31, 2009 at 07:36 AM
I read somewhere (I can't remember where) that it was to do with the flower colours being red, white & blue (red on fading), which would also tie in with Pulmonaria and Symphytum. But I've got no idea how those colours relate to those three characters.
Posted by: Mike Grant | November 02, 2009 at 03:50 AM
But I don't think Trachystemon has flowers which change colour like that. Obviously there are no flowers to examine in November but Masha Bennett's book on the borage family simply says "purplish-blue". Or perhaps she and I are both wrong. Have no fear, I'll return to this vital topic of fundamental international botanical significance in the spring!
Posted by: Graham Rice | November 02, 2009 at 06:52 AM
I believe the connection is simply that by being able to see a cluster with three differently coloured flowers, side by side, one might have said, "Look, there's Abraham, Isaac and Jacob", or in other words, three generations side by side, the older flower possibly looking a little less fresh than the younger. ;)
Posted by: Mark | November 02, 2009 at 07:21 AM
Yes, Mark, seems very reasonable - thanks.
Posted by: Graham Rice | November 04, 2009 at 09:03 AM